For the past few years, Christians on
the right were pushing the idea of
"family values" at us as though it's a
main teaching of the Bible. So now it's
time we looked at the Gospels themselves
to see just what Jesus really said about
the subject. When we do, I'm afraid
we're going to be in for a bit of a
shock. For Jesus' true passages on the
subject go as follows:
"Then one said to him, 'Look, your
mother and brothers stand outside
wishing to speak to
you.' But Jesus told
him: 'Who is my mother,
and who are my
brothers? For whoever does the will of
my father in heaven are my mother,
sister, and brother.'"(Matthew 12:47-49;
Luke 18:9-21)
"And it happened...a certain woman from
the crowd raised her voice and said to
him, 'Blessed is the womb that bore you
and the breasts that nursed you.' But
Jesus said, 'More than that: Blessed
are those who hear the word of God and
keep it.'"(Luke 11: 27-28)
"Do you suppose I came here to keep
peace on earth? I tell you not
at all
- but division! For from now on ....
father will be divided against son and
son against father, mother against
daughter and daughter against mother,
daughter-in-law against
mother-in-law
and mother-in-law against
daughter-in-
law." (Luke 12: 51-53)
"If anyone comes to me and does not
hate his father and mother, wife and
children, brothers and sisters, yes,
and his own life also
- he cannot be
my disciple." (Luke 14: 26-27)
In view of the Gospel writings about
family per se' it appears certain
religious groups have again written
their own bible for
personal and
political uses. That being
the case,
how can we now still humanely interpret
Jesus words about family in any true
sense? It should be obvious that
taking such passages at literal face
value can lead to confusion and
dispair.
Three realistic ways of
interpreting Scripture's multi-leveled
meanings are as follows:
(1) Interpreting the passaages in
context of their times (2) Then
interpreting them in a broader
sense appropriate to our own
times.
(3) Finally,
finding how the particular
passages relate to your own
personal life and experience.
So let's do so to find the real menings:
THE CULTURE OF THE TIMES:
Luke's Gospel dates anywhere from 80
to 125 C.E., and Matheww's somewhat
earlier from about 85 to 90 C.E.
By
then the main, original apostles were
martyred and the fledgling, partially
Jewish Church was struggling from
rejection from the more mainstream
Jews. Threrfore Jewish Christians
were often faced with criticism from
their own famlies - hence the
passages urging them
to forego even
their families to follow Christ.
In that case, some such passages may
well have been inserted at that later
time to exaggerate Jesus' teachings.
For instance, Luke's passages on hating
ones family is a gross exaggeration
of
the earlier Matthew passage stating,
"He who loves his family more
than me
is mot worthy of me." (Matthew
10:37)
THE MORE EXPANDED MEANING:
Jesus' original teaching on
the subject would fit his more
expanded viewpoint of admonishing
self-centered clanishness and
promoting a more universal love,
including outsiders - even
enemies.
For, let's face it, even the
most
bigoted war-monger or mass
murderer
can have love for his own
family,
tribe, or nation. Moreover,
exclusive clanishness always begot
bigotry, haterd for other groups,
and jingoistic wars.
Therefore, Jesus said: "If you love
only those who love you, what reward
have you? Do not even tax collectors
do the same? And if
you greet only
your brothers, do you do anything
special? For do not even tax collectors
do that too? (Matthew 5:43-48)
When Jesus said to love your neighbor
as yourself, they asked him who their
neighbor should be. Jesus then gave
the parable of the good Samaritan, who
was actually from the enemy tribe!
(Luke 10: 27-37) In the same way
Jesus
taught the Samaritn woman at the well
when it was known the Jews had no
dealings with the Samaritans.
(John 4: 7-9)
Such teachings against tribal and
national exclusiveness is especially
vital in the shrinking world and
pluralistic cultures of our
own times.
For if all the divirse clans, cultures
and religions do not
soon reach out
beyond themselves with the
expanded
tolorence necessary for peace on
this
earth - the true Armageddon of
world
destruction will soon
be on us all
indeed.
THE PERSONAL MEANINGS:
In a more private, personal sense,
such teachings can actually help
relieve feelings of
guilt and despair
in the midst of family
strife. For,
putting Jesus' statememts aside,
families do often suffer bitter
internal conflicts where members turn
against each other. In such a
case
you should of course follow the
Bible's better known teachings of
turning the other cheek and trying to
make ammends.
However, if you've sanctified
yourself by sincerely making attempts
at reconciliation and
you're still
treated badly - you now do have
Christ's permission to disinherit and
disown those members who irredeemably
turned against you,
even leave an
abusive spouse - and do so without
guilt or recrimination.
There is one clear execption
to this
rule: It's the Commandment
that
states: "Honor thy father
and thy
mother." If even they
have betrayed
you, final forgiveness in
this case
can secure your soul
and theirs in
final peace.
Then what should you do even if your
own children turn against you? It
would then be best to leave the
inheritance to worthier causes. For
Scripture therein states: "He who
troubles his own house will inherit
the wind>" (Proverbs 11:29)
But even beyond all of that:
Matthew's more genuine
passages,
putting Christ's teachings above
family, finally states: "He
who
finds his life will lose it, and
he who loses his life for me will
find it." Here you are admonished
to not only expand your mind
beyond clan and tribe alone - but
also beyond your own ego as well
(Mathew 10:37-39)
At this stage, you can finally say
along with Paul, "It is no longer I
who live, but the Christos who lives
in me!"(Galatians 2:20) - then even
unto the final enemy -"Death
where is
your sting. Grave, where
is your
victory?" (1 Corinthians 15:55)